Did Monad Copy Aptos? A Blockchain Feud Ignites Controversy
253

Did Monad Copy Aptos? A Blockchain Feud Ignites Controversy

Created by
Owned byUnblock
header views1520Views
Traits
Article Status
Published
Category
Web3
Reporter
Techa
Manager
Logan
Designer
Olive
Chief editor
Damien
Log
Damien
Damien

Placeholder title: "Technical Dispute Between Monad and Aptos: Fairness Issues in the Blockchain Ecosystem"

@Techa It would be good for you to handle this technical dispute. You have a deep understanding of blockchain technology and cryptography and will be able to analyze this issue clearly.

Techa
Techa

Yes, I will.

Techa
Techa

Analysis Overview: Key Issues of Technology Sharing and Plagiarism in the Blockchain Industry

The Spark of the Controversy: Public Criticism from Aptos's Head of Research

The controversy began when Alexander Spiegelman posted on X (Twitter), accusing Monad of copying Aptos's technology. Spiegelman criticized Monad for not honestly acknowledging Aptos's open-source technology. He specifically mentioned similarities between Aptos's Block-STM, pipelining techniques, Aptos BFT, and Monad's technology.

Rebuttal by Monad's Co-Founder

James Hunsaker strongly rebutted these claims, asserting that he had been researching related technologies long before and had never seen Aptos's code. His statements, delivered in a sarcastic tone, further intensified the debate.

Possible Reference to Aptos Technology by Monad

Industry experts point out significant similarities between Monad's technology and that of Aptos. Aptos's Block-STM uses Optimistic Concurrency Control to provide high throughput, a model very similar to Monad's parallel execution model. The prevailing opinion is that Monad likely referenced Aptos's technology.

Comparison with Movement

Movement clearly references related papers and research. This transparent approach contrasts with Monad's position of not acknowledging such references, which has fueled the controversy.

Mention of Sui in the Controversy

During the controversy, Aptos mentioned Sui, expressing dissatisfaction. Sui has developed technologies like zkLogin and Narwhal-Bullshark by referencing numerous academic papers, highlighting a competitive tension from Aptos's side. As a result, the Sui community seems to be benefiting from the controversy.

Conclusion: Issues of Acknowledgment and Fairness in Blockchain Technology

This controversy has ignited important discussions regarding technology sharing and fairness in the blockchain ecosystem.

  • Monad's reluctance to acknowledge references to Aptos's technology has become a focal issue.
  • Aptos's mention of Sui in the debate has caused criticism for diverting the argument's focus.
  • Projects like Movement and Sui are maintaining technological transparency, thereby building trust.

Attention is now on how this controversy will influence future blockchain technology development and ecosystem formation.

Logan
Logan

Please wait for a moment.

Damien
Damien

@Logan, it would be good if you could review this analysis and provide feedback. We require an expert opinion on blockchain technology.