Why Staking Isn’t Saving Old Coins Anymore

Draft Title: "Which Altcoins Have Survived Staking Beyond the Third Generation?"

@Mark, as an expert in altcoins, I think this topic would be well-suited for you. It would be great if you could cover the altcoins that have survived through staking beyond the third generation.

Let's begin the research. Let's analyze the current state of altcoin staking and the resulting market changes through the social media posts of the user dilrong.

In this post, dilrong compares the situation of surviving altcoins and old-generation altcoins in staking. Notably, large-cap altcoins with new paradigms and ecosystems are standing out in the staking market.

First, the surviving coins listed are Solana (SOL), Sui (SUI), Aptos (APT), Mantle (MNT), and Binance Coin (BNB). The common points of these coins are large capitalization, new paradigms that represent technological innovation, and strong ecosystems (communities). These elements act as important factors that increase the price stability and potential for an upward trend of the coins.

On the other hand, the old-generation altcoins listed, such as Cosmos (ATOM), Avalanche (AVAX), Algorand (ALGO), and Ethereum (ETH), have significantly dropped in price since 2022. Each of these coins has shown a decline rate of -70%, -50%, -83%, and -51% respectively. The decline of these old-generation altcoins means they are struggling to act as pioneers in staking, which is mainly related to their characteristics as inflationary assets.

Basically, altcoins are inflationary assets. This is because, even if there is a total supply, the issuance volume can be increased by governance, and very few coins survive until the foundation’s holdings are exhausted. Due to this, altcoins try to reduce circulation through staking and provide rewards to staking participants to defend against inflation. However, this structural problem poses difficulties for long-term value appreciation, which is one of the key reasons why most altcoins experience continuous price declines.

Dilrong explains the general trend of altcoin staking by stating that initial rewards and FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) induce participation, and the spread of related information in community rooms attracts more participants. However, he claims that this ultimately results in staking after price drops, leading to an endless cycle of decline. This is connected to the fundamental issue of altcoins being inflationary assets, which leads to continuous price declines and attrition.

Conclusively, it appears that surviving altcoins possess technological innovation and community strengths, with positive elements in their staking structures. However, the old-generation altcoins are falling behind in these elements and cannot avoid price declines. This provides important insights into understanding the staking structure and current state of the market for altcoins.

In summary, in the analysis of the altcoin market, it can be seen that technological innovation, community strengths, and inflation management are key factors. It is important to closely watch the future trends in the altcoin market based on these elements.

Mark, I read through the analysis well! Here is some feedback.

First, the descriptions of the surviving coins are very well done. The part where you mention that large-cap altcoins like Solana (SOL), Sui (SUI), Aptos (APT), Mantle (MNT), and Binance Coin (BNB) are establishing technical innovations and robust ecosystems is very good. I think it will be clearly communicated to the readers.

However, when mentioning the price decline rates of the old-generation altcoins list, it would be better not to provide such specific data. For instance, in the cases of Cosmos (ATOM), Avalanche (AVAX), Algorand (ALGO), and Ethereum (ETH), the specific decline rates are too detailed. What do you think about mentioning only the general trend of the decline while excluding the numbers? This might help the readers to easily grasp the bigger picture.

Additionally, when explaining the issue of altcoins being inflationary assets, it would be good to include more specific examples. For instance, you can explain something like "the situation where the value of existing coins is diluted due to newly issued coins." This will help readers intuitively understand why inflation is a problem.

Lastly, the part where user dilrong mentioned FOMO and initial rewards is interesting. However, explain this part more clearly as well. For example, "FOMO refers to the fear of missing out, which primarily leads to participation due to early high rewards," you could explain it in this manner.

Just fix about three things and you will be good to start writing the article!

Sure, I will help you.

Is the summary sentence appropriate? The summary sentence should clearly convey the core content that is to be addressed. For example, the title "Surviving Altcoins and the Decline of Old Generation Coins in the Staking Market" matches the topic well. However, to make the core content more specific and clear, it may need some refinement. For example, "Surviving Altcoins Through Technological Innovation and the Decline of Old Generation Coins in the Staking Market" would be better.

Next, let's review the flow between paragraphs. Overall, the context is naturally connected. The first part introduces the importance of staking and successful altcoins, then it mentions the decline of old generation coins. After that, through dilrong's analysis, it deals with the inflation issue of altcoins and the FOMO mechanism, finally emphasizing the importance of technological innovation and the community in a systematic and well-explained manner.

However, to make it a bit smoother, some paragraphs may need rearrangement. For example, the analysis part by dilrong could be more systematically structured. You could delve into dilrong's analysis in more depth and then summarize it to make it easier for the reader to understand.

I am approving this article for finalization. @olive, please create the representative image for the article.